Everything is a Freaking DNS problem - acquia http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/taxonomy/term/870/0 en Option D http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/option-d <p>Lots of people writing about Snorkle again today ,Monty <a href="http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html" rel="nofollow">Says, help saving MySQL</a></p> <p>He gives us different options, a , b or c .. but I , and some others, want an option d </p> <p>No I don't trust Oracle, it's not like they have been a very good Open Source Citizen, yes they contribute to the kernel and other projects but my feeling says it's only because they have to (Kernel, Xen and others ) not because they Want to (thinking about Unfakable etc) , if they would really want to they probably would work with the CentOS community more etc, and as Monty mentions their InnoDB track record could be better.</p> <p>But on the other hand I don't think the EU should block the deal because Monty wants his baby back , cheap , as honestly imvho that's what they really want, be able to buy MySQL back for a nice price, either beceause Oracle is being forced by the EU to split up Sun, or eventually the deal doesn't come trough and they can buy MySQL back when Sun really goes belly up (which is what probably happens when option a) is chosen.</p> <p>According to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/marketwire/0568514.htm" rel="nofollow">CNN</a> , Oracle has made some pledges about MySQL earlier today.<br /> My main question there however is about the Opposite of option 5. which is exactly what created the problem.<br /> <cite><br /> 5. Support not mandatory. Customers will not be required to purchase support services from Oracle as a condition to obtaining a commercial license to MySQL. </cite></p> <p>Yes we want support, but no we don't want a commercial license with it, we want support on the GPL version, which is a problem lots of Open Source vendors struggle with , some of them<br /> force people wanting to buy support to go for the commercial license. And it is exaclty that upselling that got MySQL in the troubles it has today .</p> <p>Josh Berkus has a point declaring<br /> <a href="http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/database-soup/snoracle-mysql-and-the-death-of-duallicensing-35850?rss=1" rel="nofollow">Dual Licensing dead</a>, just as I he sees much more future in the Percona like model than in the Dual License model MySQL used to have ..</p> <p>Dries <a href="http://pooteeweet.org/blog/0/1639#m1639" rel="nofollow"> points</a> to one of the comments on<br /> <a href="http://twitter.com/Dries/status/6660856340" rel="nofollow"> Lukas Kahwe Smith 's Come On Money er Monty article</a> stating<br /> <cite>Monty walks away with several millions in hard cash, while [PHP +] MySQL cheerleaders who bet on "MySQL" franchise only walk away with a cute dolphin T-shirt</cite></p> <p>Which makes me wonder when I`ll be getting a nice Acquia T-shirt :)</p> http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/option-d#comments acquia drupal eu mysql open source oracle php snorkle Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:30:42 +0000 Kris Buytaert 969 at http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog Drupal and MySQL http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/641 <p>For <a href="http://acquia.com/" rel="nofollow">a company</a> that wants to become the RedHat of Drupal, Kieran is pointing a lot to <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/" rel="nofollow">RedHat's competition</a> :)</p> <p>But indeed the Brainstorm idea is a good one... if Sun wants to keep up the "big user community, no contributor community" model for it's products this is the least they can do.</p> <p>Kieran also calls for more crossposting between the mysql and drupal planets :)</p> http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog/node/641#comments acquia drupal mysql ubuntu brainstorm Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:47:35 +0000 Kris Buytaert 641 at http://127.0.0.1:8080/blog